Estate Tax Portability

The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 has an important provision that is now permanent after a two-year trial period.  It allows the $5.25 million estate tax exemption of one spouse to be carried forward to the surviving spouse.  In the past the exemption was personal and was lost upon death to the extent it hadn't already been used.  As a result, the Marital Deduction or A-B Trust came into play, whereby the decedent's estate was divided into two portions, one to take advantage of the marital deduction, the other to use the unlimited spousal exemption.

Now, with portability, if the first spouse has an estate under the cap, currently $5.25 million, he can pass that exemption to the surviving spouse, who can then add it to her own $5.25 million exemption for a total of $10.5 million that she can leave tax-free.  Any unused portion of the $5.25 million exemption can similarly be transferred to the surviving spouse.

As Deborah L. Jacobs of Forbes magazine explains in this article, even if no estate tax return is due from the first spouse, the executor must still file an estate tax return, Form 706, in order to preserve the portability.  Failure to do that results in the loss of the first exemption.

Post Election Uncertainty

The great election of 2012 is now history and President Obama will serve another four years.  In response to  his re-election the NYSE dropped to its lowest point in a year.  That's probably the best indication that business doesn't favor what the future might hold under a second Obama administration.

One issue that has been waiting for resolution until after the election is the estate and gift tax.  The Bush era tax cuts are set to expire at the end of the year, reverting the estate and gift tax exemption to $1,000,000 from its current $5+ million.  If that should happen (and that's a big IF), a lot of families could get caught with an unexpected estate tax.  Five million is a lot of money in an estate, but one million, even with today's depressed real estate values, is not that uncommon.

There's no clear-cut answer.  President Obama has said he's in favor of allowing the tax cuts to expire. Does that mean he would veto an extension if passed by Congress?  Give that the House is under Republican control while the Senate is under the Democrats, will Congress even work together to pass a bill in time to present to the president?  Most advisers are saying to use your exemption while it exists if you would have an estate tax issue under a reduced, $1,000,000, exemption.  If you fall in that category, or even think you might, talk to a qualified estate planning attorney.

Donor's Remorse

Now that 2010 finally ended and Congress finally acted with respect to the estate and gift tax, a lot of gift and estate tax lawyers and their clients are trying to figure out how to reverse taxable gifts they made in 2010. It's a classic case of "it seemed like a good idea at the time." And it did.

This was the situation: In 2010 there was no estate tax. It was scheduled to return in 2011, but with only a $1 million exemption, as opposed to the $3.5 million exemption that existed in 2009, and at a 55% tax rate. To avoid a 55% tax on estates over the $1 million exemption, many estate and gift tax lawyers advised their clients to make taxable gifts in 2010. The reasoning was, the gift tax is only 35%. Better to save 20% in taxes by making a gift now than risking dying in 2011 or after.

But in January, Congress amended the tax code to provide for a $5 million exemption ($10 million for couples) and imposed only a 35% tax rate. Now, many of those people who made taxable gifts last year are realizing that they could have avoided any tax simply by waiting. For those with estates between $1 million and $5 million, this is certainly true. So they and their attorneys are scrambling to see if there is a way to undo the gifts they made last year.

This is a classic case of people ignoring the sage advice my tax professor gave in law school: Never do anything solely for the tax consequences. Do something that makes sense from a business standpoint and deal with the tax issue at that time. The people who made taxable gifts in 2010 did so solely in hopes of avoiding a possible estate tax.

Last Minute Tax Planning

This is the time of year that many people start last-minute tax planning. This year, because the estate tax was repealed for 2010 and the gift tax was reduced to 35%, last minute planning is even more important, and may really be last minute. There is a lot of uncertainty about whether Congress will retroactively reinstate the estate tax for 2010 and retroactively increase the gift tax to the scheduled 55% that will be imposed on January 1, 2011. While we don't recommend that anyone die before December 31 just to take advantage of the lack of an estate tax in 2010, gift planning should be considered.

Everyone can give up to $13,000 tax free to any other person, and the number of people to whom you can give $13,000 is not limited. Beyond that, if you want to give more to a single person, you have a $1 million lifetime exemption that was formerly tied to the estate tax exemption. To the extent you use the lifetime exemption for gifts, it isn't available to reduce the estate tax. If you choose not to use the lifetime exemption, gifts in excess of $13,000 are taxed at 35%. However, if the gift tax bumps up to 55% as scheduled on January 1, and especially if the estate tax exemption is lowered to $1 million, also as scheduled, it might make sense to give gifts this year and pay the 35% tax as opposed to using any part of the lifetime exemption or paying the 55% tax rate next year.

The prudent thing seems to be to plan for some gifts, but not actually make them until late December when Congress has adjourned for the year and any retroactive legislation might be a little clearer. Then consult with your tax professional.

Estate Tax Status

We are fast approaching the end of 2010, and the end of the no-death-tax year. The estate tax went away on December 31, 2009, and hasn't been in effect since then. It is scheduled to return in 2011, with a higher rate and a lower exemption. Most observers don't believe that will happen, but Congressional gridlock might rule the day.

According to the Wall Street Journal, the most likely scenario is that Congress will enact a stop-gap measure that will reinstate the estate tax at 2009 levels. That means $3.5 million in exemption and a top rate of 45%, rather than the $1 million exemption and 55% rate now scheduled if Congress doesn't act. One thing that does seem certain is the estate tax will be back in 2011 in one form or another.

Estate Tax Update

2010 is nearly half over and Congress still hasn't done anything about the estate tax. It expired on December 31, 2009, leaving the United States without an estate tax for the first time since 1916. It's scheduled to be resurrected in 2011 at levels unseen since the Clinton administration.

For now, someone like Dan Duncan, who died earlier this year leaving an estate worth an estimated $9 billion, can pass his estate free of any tax to his heirs. Had Mr. Duncan died in 2009, the estate would have been taxed at 45%, meaning just over $4 billion would have gone to the IRS. Had he survived until next year, when the estate tax is scheduled to come back at 55%, his heirs would have lost nearly $5 billion.

But the real losers in the estate tax mess are the merely rich, those with estates between $1 million and $3.5 million. In 2009, the estate tax exemption was $3.5 million, meaning estates under that amount didn't pay any tax. In 2011 the exemption will drop to $1 million and the 55% rate will kick in. Many of those people have set up their estate plans under 2009 rules on the assumption they would owe no tax. If they don't act quickly, they could end up losing a bundle.

Review Your Estate Planning Documents

In the last estate planning post, I noted that Congress had failed to extend the estate tax, and this was creating all sorts of uncertainty for planners in 2010. The uncertainty doesn't end with what might be done in the future. The repeal of the estate tax could throw a monkey wrench into existing estate plans.

This is because many plans were writtent to take advantage of the spousal exemption. Under the Internal Revenue Code, a certain amount of the estate was exempt if passed to a surviving spouse. As a result, many estate plans provided for a division of the estate, with a portion equal to the spouse's exemption going to the spouse, the rest going into a trust or somewhere else. With the repeal of the estate tax, these plans could be read such that the surviving spouse gets nothing, i.e., since there is no estate tax, there is no spousal exemption. Thus, everything goes into the trust or elsewhere, where the spouse can't get at it. This is clearly not what most people would want for a surviving spouse, but it might be exactly what happens.

Review your estate planning documents.

Death and Taxes

Nothing is certain but death and taxes, goes the old saying. But combine the two and nothing is certain but uncertainty. The new year came without Congress extending the estate tax (the House voted to extend the tax, but the Senate didn't act), so for 2010 it is gone. It's scheduled to revive at a higher rate (55% vs. 45% in 2009) and lower exemption ($1 million vs. $3.5 million in 2009). Most commentators expected Congress to extend the tax in 2010. Most commentators were wrong.

2010 marks the first year since 1916 that a person can die without an estate tax. That is making for a lot of macabre jokes about doing in a rich relative. The truth, though, is 2010 might not be such a great year to die anyway. In the Internal Revenue Code there is a provision for "stepped up basis," which means that when property passed by inheritance, the basis (amount at which the property was acquired) was stepped up to the date of death. That meant, for example, if Uncle Harry owned real estate that he purchased in 1950 for $10,000 and it is today worth $750,000, the basis to the heirs became $750,000, saving a bundle in capital gains taxes. But this provision went away with the estate tax. So now the heirs are looking at a capital gain tax on $740,000, the difference between the 1950 basis of $10,000, and today's value of $750,000 should they sell. Assuming values continue upward, that taxable gain will only get bigger.

House Votes to Extend Death Tax

The House of Representatives voted to extend the estate tax, which was set to expire in 2010 as part of the Bush-era tax cuts. The Senate still has to approve an extension, an unlikely event before December 31, given that the Senate is pre-occupied with the health care reform issue. A likely alternative is that the Senate votes to temporarily extend the estate tax until it can take up debate on a permanent extension.

As presently written, the estate tax would have expired in 2010, only to be revived in 2011 at a higher rate, 55% instead of the current 45%. The House extension maintains the maximum rate at 45% and applies only to estates over $3.5 million.

Republicans are unanimous in their support of repealing the estate tax, which, they say, hurts small businesses such as farmers and car dealerships that have substantial assets that bump the value above the exemption limit. Maintaining the estate tax burdens the transer and, therefore, the viability, of family owned businesses from one generation to the next.

Death and Taxes

To many people, estate planning is all about avoiding the estate and inheritance tax. That's why a lot of people give little thought to estate planning, because, as we've discussed, they don't consider themselves wealthy enough to have to worry about estate taxes. We discussed why estate planning is important even aside from taxes, but today we are discussing estate taxes.

There is a lifetime exemption amount for estate taxes. It's a combined estate and gift tax exemption, so to the extent that the exemption is used to give gifts tax free during life, it isn't available at death. But putting that aside, right now (2009) the estate tax exemption is $3.5 million. In 2010, the estate tax is slated to go away altogether. But Congress will probably renew it in 2011 and later, and there is talk that the exemption will be scaled back to the $1 million it was under the Clinton Administration.

Everything that you own at your death is included in your estate. This means all land (houses, rental properties, vacant land, vacation homes, etc.), bank accounts, CDs, stocks, bonds, vehicles, computers, everything down to your china and silverware. Even in today's depressed market, if you have a home, with everything else included, you could be bumping up against the $1 million mark. If that's the case, keep a close eye on the estate tax debates. And if you're up over $1 million, you definitely need to talk to an estate planning attorney.

Of course, everyone should have basic estate planning documents: will, durable power of attorney, and living will (medical directive).

Estate Tax to Continue

President-elect Barack Obama announced recently that he intends to continue the estate tax (dubbed the "Death Tax" by opponents) instead of letting it expire in 2010 as originally planned by the new Bush administration in 2001. Under the current provisions of the estate tax, estates over $3.5 million are taxed at 45%. Estates under $3.5 million ($7 million for married couples) are exempt from the tax. However, there is no guarantee the Obama administration will maintain the estate tax at this level. During President Clinton's administration, estates over $1 million were taxed at a 55% rate; President Bush increased the exemption gradually, with a proposed phase out completely next year.

The estate tax has been criticized as restricting a business owner's ability to pass on the fruits of a lifetime. The most common example given is of a family farmer who is "land rich and cash poor". Imposing a 45% tax on the value of the farm likely means the farm will have to be sold to pay Uncle Sam.

While most people will not have to worry about the estate tax in their estate planning, everyone should be aware of its existence and now of its permanence.