Creditors Should Read Their Mail

On March 23 the Supreme Court of the United States issued an opinion in a bankruptcy case that, in essence, says creditors need to read their mail. The case is United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Espinosa. Justice Thomas delivered a unanimous opinion.

The facts are fairly simple. Espinosa had several student loans that totalled $13,000. In his Chapter 13 plan he proposed to pay principal only, no interest, which resulted in a discharge of the interest. Normally, any discharge of any part of a student loan requires an adversary proceeding and a finding of a "hardship discharge." In this case, neither the creditor nor the trustee objected to Espinosa's plan. Espinosa completed his plan and received a discharge.

Several years later, United Student Aid Funds attempted to collect by garnishing Espinosa's tax refund. Espinosa responded by reopening his bankruptcy case to obtain an order prohibiting United Student Aid Funds from trying to collect. The case eventually worked its way to the Supreme Court. There were several complicated legal issues involved in the case, but the bottom line is, where a creditor admittedly received a copy of the plan and failed to object, it can't come back years later and ask the court to fix its mistake.

Automobile Claims and Bankruptcy

Toyota has recalled thousands of vehicles for accelerator problems. Now Honda has recalled over 400,000 vehicles for brake problems. With all of those recalls, it's certain that some owners of the recalled cars are contemplating filing or have filed bankruptcy.

In the case of Toyota, a few lawsuits seeking class action status for those involved in accidents allegedly caused by the defects have already been filed. Such lawsuits may be filed by Honda owners. If you are among those affected by these recalls and are in or considering bankruptcy, beware. You might have a claim against the manufacturer. If so, that claim is probably property of your bankruptcy estate and you are obligated to disclose it to the trustee, who may or may not decide to pursue it. Be sure to let your bankruptcy attorney know that you own a car covered by the recalls so he can investigate whether to list a potential lawsuit or participation in a class action in your bankruptcy filing.

Why is the Estate Tax So Controversial?

Taxes are a fact of life, whether they are income tax, sales tax, property tax, or a tax on gasoline. We grumble about paying taxes, but accept them. Why, then, is the estate tax so controversial?

For starters, because Congress waffles back and forth about eliminating it. The estate tax was scheduled, in 2001, to disappear permanently in 2010. It has disappeared, but is slated to return in 2011. Like a bad penny, it keeps turning up.

But probably the biggest reason for controversy is over who (or what) the estate tax hits and how much it actually contributes to public revenue. By some estimates the estate tax only provies 1% or less of all public revenue. By contrast, it impacts to the point of destroying some small family businesses. When a small business owner dies his business may be asset-rich but cash-poor. The business may have inventory, equipment, land and other assets that give it a value, on paper, in excess of the exemption amount ($3.5 million the last time there was an estate tax). But there may be very little cash with which to pay the tax. So in many cases, the business has to be sold to pay the tax, leaving a pittance to heirs, compared to the value they would have received had the business been passed on intact.

A similar concern is the fact that the estate tax is one last gouge at a lifetime of savings. Consider, for example, an estate that consists of stocks and bonds that have paid dividends and interest. The money with which those stocks and bonds were purchased was taxed with an income tax before they were even bought. Then the income from the stocks and bonds (the dividends or interest payments) were taxed again as income. The dividends had already been taxed at the corporate level before they were paid. Finally, on death, there is an estate tax levied. That's up to four separate taxes imposed. To a lot of people, that's at least one tax too many.

Bankruptcy and Taxes

If you thought death and taxes were bad, wait until you try bankruptcy and taxes. When you file bankruptcy, there is an estate created, which consists of all your property and all your debts at the instant you file. Included in that is taxes that you might later owe for income earned up to the point of filing, and refunds to which you might be entitled for overpayments through withholding as of the same date. A little known provision in the Internal Revenue Code allows you to create two taxable years. One for the part of the year prior to your bankruptcy filing date, which is the portion that is in your estate; and one for the remainder of the year. Whether or not to make this election depends on a number of things. So in addition to talking to a bankruptcy attorney before you file bankruptcy, talk to an accountant or tax attorney as well.

Review Your Estate Planning Documents

In the last estate planning post, I noted that Congress had failed to extend the estate tax, and this was creating all sorts of uncertainty for planners in 2010. The uncertainty doesn't end with what might be done in the future. The repeal of the estate tax could throw a monkey wrench into existing estate plans.

This is because many plans were writtent to take advantage of the spousal exemption. Under the Internal Revenue Code, a certain amount of the estate was exempt if passed to a surviving spouse. As a result, many estate plans provided for a division of the estate, with a portion equal to the spouse's exemption going to the spouse, the rest going into a trust or somewhere else. With the repeal of the estate tax, these plans could be read such that the surviving spouse gets nothing, i.e., since there is no estate tax, there is no spousal exemption. Thus, everything goes into the trust or elsewhere, where the spouse can't get at it. This is clearly not what most people would want for a surviving spouse, but it might be exactly what happens.

Review your estate planning documents.

The Best Time to File Bankruptcy

Since the passage of the Bankruptcy Abuse and Consumer Protection Act in 2005, timing a bankruptcy filing has become more important than ever. First is the means test, which we have discussed previously. The means test looks at a debtor's income over the past six months, so if you received a big bonus in the past six months, you might want to wait a month or two so that bonus isn't included in the calculation of average income. Secondly, if you're facing foreclosure or having wages garnished, you probably want to file as soon as possible, like yesterday. Thirdly, if you have some cash on hand or other assets that are subject to being taken by the bankruptcy trustee, you may want to delay filing while you engage in some exemption planning. There is nothing wrong with using non-exempt assets (such as cash or selling stocks) to acquire exempt assets (such as clothes, food, a new washer/dryer or refrigerator). All of these considerations have to be weighed to determine when is the best time for you to file.

Death and Taxes

Nothing is certain but death and taxes, goes the old saying. But combine the two and nothing is certain but uncertainty. The new year came without Congress extending the estate tax (the House voted to extend the tax, but the Senate didn't act), so for 2010 it is gone. It's scheduled to revive at a higher rate (55% vs. 45% in 2009) and lower exemption ($1 million vs. $3.5 million in 2009). Most commentators expected Congress to extend the tax in 2010. Most commentators were wrong.

2010 marks the first year since 1916 that a person can die without an estate tax. That is making for a lot of macabre jokes about doing in a rich relative. The truth, though, is 2010 might not be such a great year to die anyway. In the Internal Revenue Code there is a provision for "stepped up basis," which means that when property passed by inheritance, the basis (amount at which the property was acquired) was stepped up to the date of death. That meant, for example, if Uncle Harry owned real estate that he purchased in 1950 for $10,000 and it is today worth $750,000, the basis to the heirs became $750,000, saving a bundle in capital gains taxes. But this provision went away with the estate tax. So now the heirs are looking at a capital gain tax on $740,000, the difference between the 1950 basis of $10,000, and today's value of $750,000 should they sell. Assuming values continue upward, that taxable gain will only get bigger.